NIRSTORM: a Brainstorm extension dedicated to functional near-infrared spectroscopy data analysis, advanced 3D reconstructions, and optimal probe design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Significance: Understanding the brain's complex functions requires multimodal approaches that combine data from various neuroimaging techniques. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) offers valuable insights into hemodynamic responses, complementing other modalities such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), and magnetic resonance imaging. However, there is a lack of comprehensive and accessible toolboxes able to integrate fNIRS advanced analyses with other modalities. NIRSTORM addresses this gap by offering a unified platform for multimodal neuroimaging analysis. Aim: NIRSTORM aims to provide a user-friendly and comprehensive environment for multimodal analysis while supporting the entire fNIRS analysis pipeline, from experiment planning to the reconstruction of hemodynamic fluctuations on the cortex. Approach: , NIRSTORM operates as a Brainstorm plugin, enhancing Brainstorm's capabilities for analyzing fNIRS data. Brainstorm is a widely used, GUI-based software originally designed for statistical analysis and source imaging of EEG and MEG data. Results: NIRSTORM supports conventional fNIRS preprocessing and statistical analyses while introducing new advanced features such as optimal montage for planning optode placement and maximum entropy on the mean (MEM) for reconstructing hemodynamic fluctuations on the cortical surface. Conclusion: As an open-access and user-friendly plugin, NIRSTORM extends Brainstorm's functionality to fNIRS, bridging the gap between EEG/MEG and hemodynamic analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.056 | 0.014 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".