MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410394621 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3570505

Age of Information in Digital Twin Migration

2025· article· en· W4410394621 on OpenAlexaff
Kiana Noroozi, T.D. Todd, Dongmei Zhao, George Karakostas

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAge of Information Optimization
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Digital Twin (DT) is a virtual representation of a real physical system (PS) that interacts with other objects on its behalf. In these interactions, the Age of Information (AoI) is a key performance measure that is dependent on the DT's current network server placement. To maintain acceptable AoI performance as the system evolves, the DT location may have to be moved, which is referred to asDigital Twin migration. In this paper we consider the problem of DT migration in a vehicular system, focusing on minimizing the time-averaged AoI. In this type of system, it is difficult to maintain acceptable AoI performance due to the speed of the vehicles, which can result in frequent abrupt handoffs between different cellular domains. This makes the question of when to initiate DT migration an important one. The problem is formulated as a Markovian stopping problem and an optimal online algorithm is proposed using dynamic programming and the statistics of vehicular motion. A more computationally intensive adaptive version of this algorithm is also proposed where the dynamic programming tables are recomputed at each time step. A best-in-expectation algorithm is introduced that gives sub-optimal AoI performance but is more computationally efficient than in the optimal version. These algorithms are also compared to heuristics that do immediate migration and migration at handoff. An offline algorithm is formulated that provides a lower bound on the average AoI that is attainable. Performance results show that the proposed algorithm can significantly improve the efficiency of Digital Twin migrations compared to the other approaches while guaranteeing the minimized time-averaged AoI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicAge of Information OptimizationFrench-language works237,207