MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410419875 · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125774

Microbial composition and bioremediation in frass fertilizers from insect-based agri-food waste valorization

2025· article· en· W4410419875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Management · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBill Graham Memorial FoundationAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónAustralian Centre for International Agricultural ResearchDirektion für Entwicklung und ZusammenarbeitCurt Bergfors FoundationDirektoratet for UtviklingssamarbeidGovernment of the Republic of KenyaNovo Nordisk FondenMinistère de l'Europe et des Affaires ÉtrangèresBundesministerium für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und EntwicklungMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesCanadian Association of PathologistsIKEA FoundationStyrelsen för Internationellt UtvecklingssamarbeteRockefeller FoundationEuropean CommissionBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsFrassBioremediationFood wasteEnvironmental scienceWaste managementGreen wasteBiodegradationAgronomyBiotechnologyCompostBiologyEcologyContaminationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Insect frass fertilizer is emerging as a sustainable and novel input for improving soil health and crop production; however, research attention on its safety and microbial properties remains limited. Here, we evaluated the levels of heavy metals, pathogens, diversity, abundance, composition and functional roles of bacteria and fungi in frass fertilizer produced by eight edible insect species. Our results revealed the absence of Salmonella spp. In the frass fertilizers produced by all insect species, while the levels of other pathogens and heavy metals were within permissible limits for organic fertilizers. We found that 79-86 % of the variations in bacterial and fungal communities in the frass fertilizers were influenced by the species of insects used in waste recycling. The highest richness of bacteria and fungi was recorded in the frass fertilizers generated from Oryctes rhinoceros and Pachnoda sinuata. Taxonomic classification revealed 36 bacteria phyla across the frass fertilizers, with most belonging to Firmicutes (43 %), Proteobacteria (23 %), and Actinobacteriota (18 %), whereas the main fungal phyla were Ascomycota (80 %) and Basidiomycota (10 %). Functional profiling revealed that most fungi were sapotroph-symbiotrophs, pathogenic saprotrophs, pathotrophs, and symbiotrophic saprotrophs, which are key in organic matter decomposition, nutrient recycling and pathogen suppression. In contrast, the bacteria were mostly associated with antibiotic and phytohormone production, biosynthesis of plant growth regulators, nitrogen metabolism, nitrification, nitrogen fixation, especially in frass fertilizers derived from P. sinuata, Schistocerca gregaria, and Hermetia illucens. Our findings demonstrate the potential of insects to recycle low-value organic wastes into hygienic organic fertilizer and highlight the role of beneficial microbes, which could be harnessed for bioremediation, sustainable soil health management, improved crop productivity and food security.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score0.164

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.170
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it