SimZSL: Zero-Shot Learning Beyond a Pre-defined Semantic Embedding Space
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Zero-shot recognition is centered around learning representations to transfer knowledge from seen to unseen classes. Where foundational approaches perform the transfer with semantic embedding spaces, e.g., from attributes or word vectors, the current state-of-the-art relies on prompting pre-trained vision-language models to obtain class embeddings. Whether zero-shot learning is performed with attributes, CLIP, or something else, current approaches de facto assume that there is a pre-defined embedding space in which seen and unseen classes can be positioned. Our work is concerned with real-world zero-shot settings where a pre-defined embedding space can no longer be assumed. This is natural in domains such as biology and medicine, where class names are not common English words, rendering vision-language models useless; or neuroscience, where class relations are only given with non-semantic human comparison scores. We find that there is one data structure enabling zero-shot learning in both standard and non-standard settings: a similarity matrix spanning the seen and unseen classes. We introduce four similarity-based zero-shot learning challenges, tackling open-ended scenarios such as learning with uncommon class names, learning from multiple partial sources, and learning with missing knowledge. As the first step for zero-shot learning beyond a pre-defined semantic embedding space, we propose $$\kappa $$ κ -MDS, a general approach that obtains a prototype for each class on any manifold from similarities alone, even when part of the similarities are missing. Our approach can be plugged into any standard, hyperspherical, or hyperbolic zero-shot learner. Experiments on existing datasets and the new benchmarks show the promise and challenges of similarity-based zero-shot learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".