Hidden challenges in evaluating spillover risk of zoonotic viruses using machine learning models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Machine learning models have been deployed to assess the zoonotic spillover risk of viruses by identifying their potential for human infectivity. However, the lack of comprehensive datasets for viral infectivity poses a major challenge, limiting the predictable range of viruses. In this study, we address this limitation through two key strategies: constructing expansive datasets across 26 viral families and developing the BERT-infect model, which leverages large language models pre-trained on extensive nucleotide sequences. Here we show that our approach substantially boosts model performance. This enhancement is particularly notable in segmented RNA viruses, which are involved with severe zoonoses but have been overlooked due to limited data availability. Our model also exhibits high predictive performance even with partial viral sequences, such as high-throughput sequencing reads or contig sequences from de novo sequence assemblies, indicating the model’s applicability for mining zoonotic viruses from virus metagenomic data. Furthermore, models trained on data up to 2018 demonstrate robust predictive capability for most viruses identified post-2018. Nonetheless, high-resolution evaluation based on phylogenetic analysis reveals general limitations in current machine learning models: the difficulty in alerting the human infectious risk in specific zoonotic viral lineages, including SARS-CoV-2. Our study provides a comprehensive benchmark for viral infectivity prediction models and highlights unresolved issues in fully exploiting machine learning to prepare for future zoonotic threats. To prepare for future pandemics caused by animal-derived viruses, there is a growing need for computational models that can predict whether a virus might infect humans. We constructed extensive datasets covering information about different viruses, including key human pathogens. We developed computational models using these datasets, which outperformed existing approaches across many virus types. However, we also revealed that current models share the same unresolved challenges when assessing whether specific viruses will infect humans, including SARS-CoV-2. These findings suggest that current models may fail to identify animal viruses that can infect humans, which underscores the urgent need for improved predictive models to strengthen pandemic preparedness. Kawasaki et al. construct a dataset covering 26 viral families and use large language models pre-trained on nucleotide sequences to identify zoonotic viruses with human infectivity potential. High predictive performance was obtained, even with partial viral sequences, but not all zoonotic lineages could be identified.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".