MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410524685 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-2025-2083

Synergistic identification of hydrogeological parameters and pollution source information for groundwater point and areal source contamination based on machine learning surrogate-artificial hummingbird algorithm

2025· preprint· en· W4410524685 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsHummingbirdPollutionContaminationHydrogeologyIdentification (biology)GroundwaterAlgorithmGroundwater pollutionEnvironmental sciencePoint sourcePoint (geometry)Computer scienceNonpoint source pollutionPoint source pollutionArtificial intelligenceEnvironmental engineeringEngineeringMathematicsGeotechnical engineeringEcologyBiologyAquifer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Effectively remediating groundwater contamination relies on the precise determination of its sources. In recent years, a growing research focus has been placed on concurrently estimating hydrogeological characteristics and locating pollutant origins. However, the identification of precise synergistic identification of point and areal contamination sources of groundwater and combined hydrogeological parameters has not been effectively solved. This study developed an inversion framework that integrates machine learning surrogates with the artificial hummingbird algorithm (AHA). The surrogate models approximating the simulation system were constructed using both backpropagation neural networks (BPNN) and Kriging techniques. The AHA was then employed to solve the optimized model, and its performance was benchmarked against particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the sparrow search algorithm (SSA). The applicability of this inversion framework was assessed by application to point sources of contamination (PSC) and areal source contamination (ASC). The robustness of the framework was verified through application to scenarios with different noise levels. The results showed that surrogate model constructed by the BPNN method provided estimates that were closer to those of the simulation model in comparison to the kriging method, coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.9994 and mean relative error (MRE) is 3.70 % in PSC, and R2 is 0.9989 and MRE is 4.48 % in ASC. The performance of the AHA exceeded those of the PSO and the SSA. In PSC, MRE of the identification result is 1.58 %; In ASC, MRE of the identification result is 2.03 %, with the AHA able to rapidly and accurately identify the global optimum and improve the inversion efficiency. The proposed inversion framework was demonstrated to apply to both groundwater PSC and ASC problems with strong robustness, providing a reliable basis for groundwater pollution remediation and management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.476
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207