MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410538869 · doi:10.1007/s13755-025-00352-8

Cerebral ischemia detection using deep learning techniques

2025· article· en· W4410538869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Information Science and Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersJunta de ExtremaduraEuropean Regional Development FundUniversidad Nacional de Educación a DistanciaEuropean Commission
KeywordsMedicineComputed tomographyStroke (engine)Acute strokeIschemiaSet (abstract data type)Artificial intelligenceRadiologyEmergency departmentComputer scienceCardiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), commonly known as stroke, stands as a significant contributor to contemporary mortality and morbidity rates, often leading to lasting disabilities. Early identification is crucial in mitigating its impact and reducing mortality. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) remains the primary diagnostic tool in stroke emergencies due to its speed, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. NCCT enables the exclusion of hemorrhage and directs attention to ischemic causes resulting from arterial flow obstruction. Quantification of NCCT findings employs the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), which evaluates affected brain structures. This study seeks to identify early alterations in NCCT density in patients with stroke symptoms using a binary classifier distinguishing NCCT scans with and without stroke. To achieve this, various well-known deep learning architectures, namely VGG3D, ResNet3D, and DenseNet3D, validated in the ImageNet challenges, are implemented with 3D images covering the entire brain volume. The training results of these networks are presented, wherein diverse parameters are examined for optimal performance. The DenseNet3D network emerges as the most effective model, attaining a training set accuracy of 98% and a test set accuracy of 95%. The aim is to alert medical professionals to potential stroke cases in their early stages based on NCCT findings displaying altered density patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.891
Threshold uncertainty score0.309

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it