Cerebral ischemia detection using deep learning techniques
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cerebrovascular accident (CVA), commonly known as stroke, stands as a significant contributor to contemporary mortality and morbidity rates, often leading to lasting disabilities. Early identification is crucial in mitigating its impact and reducing mortality. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) remains the primary diagnostic tool in stroke emergencies due to its speed, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness. NCCT enables the exclusion of hemorrhage and directs attention to ischemic causes resulting from arterial flow obstruction. Quantification of NCCT findings employs the Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS), which evaluates affected brain structures. This study seeks to identify early alterations in NCCT density in patients with stroke symptoms using a binary classifier distinguishing NCCT scans with and without stroke. To achieve this, various well-known deep learning architectures, namely VGG3D, ResNet3D, and DenseNet3D, validated in the ImageNet challenges, are implemented with 3D images covering the entire brain volume. The training results of these networks are presented, wherein diverse parameters are examined for optimal performance. The DenseNet3D network emerges as the most effective model, attaining a training set accuracy of 98% and a test set accuracy of 95%. The aim is to alert medical professionals to potential stroke cases in their early stages based on NCCT findings displaying altered density patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".