MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410560778 · doi:10.1007/s10659-025-10135-7

On the Influence of a Dilatant Asperity Patch on the Seismic Moment

2025· article· en· W4410560778 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Elasticity · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersEuropean Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHorizon 2020 Framework Programme
KeywordsDilatantGeologyShear (geology)Fault planeAsperity (geotechnical engineering)Fault (geology)Geotechnical engineeringSeismologyMoment (physics)Shear stressMechanicsPetrologyPhysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper proposes a novel procedure to examine the influences of friction, dilatancy, and normal stresses at fault zones on the estimation of seismic moment. For illustrative purposes, the study focuses on a circular frictional dilatant patch located within a frictionless pre-compressed fault zone undergoing relative shear. When dilatancy occurs, the interface beyond the dilatant region may experience separation due to the normal stresses acting on the fault plane, affecting the deformational response of the pre-stressed asperity. This approach allows for an evaluation of the normal stress on the dilatant region, leading to a re-interpretation of the conventional definition of seismic moment. We compare our model against a comprehensive catalog of earthquakes spanning 16 orders of magnitude, utilizing seismologically inferred source properties as well as data from two separate experimental studies that directly measure the shear-dilatant response of shear fractures in both laboratory and field settings. Our findings indicate that friction-induced dilatancy exerts minimal influence on the estimation of seismic moment. However, we emphasize that the discrepancies between our direct measurements and inferred estimates of seismic moment highlight the need for focused campaigns and in situ and on-fault assessments of earthquake mechanics. Plain Language summary . The conventional definition of the Seismic Moment has been central to unifying information from plate tectonics, geology, geodesy, and seismology. It looks at how the ground moves along a fault plane and the strength of the surrounding rocks. However, it often overlooks other factors that might affect this movement, such as the stress on the fault and the local topography that can induce additional physical responses. This study explores how these additional factors, particularly a process called dilatancy, can change our understanding of the seismic moment. The authors found that while these factors do play a role, they have a minimal impact on the traditional definition of seismic moment initially proposed by Aki in 1966.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.354

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it