MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410563805 · doi:10.5603/imh.102582

Medical causes of repatriation in commercial seafarers and offshore workers: a scoping review

2025· review· en· W4410563805 on OpenAlexafffund
W. Shane Journeay

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Maritime Health · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Navigation and Safety
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoProvidence Health CareDalhousie University
FundersDalhousie University
KeywordsRepatriationSubmarine pipelineBusinessForensic engineeringEngineeringMedicineEnvironmental healthPolitical scienceLawGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Workers at sea including commercial seafarers and those working in offshore establishments have increased risk for occupational disease and injury. Due to limited medical resources in vessels and platforms, and the remote nature of the work, repatriation to a shore-based facility may be required for treatment. The objective of this review was to summarize the literature on medical causes of repatriation among commercial seafarers and offshore workers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As per Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews, a search for papers in English of Medline, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Scopus and Oceanic Abstracts was conducted. Studies that reported medical causes of repatriations in commercial seafarers and offshore workers were included. For the purposes of this study, commercial seafarers and offshore workers are defined as persons working in the maritime environment for three or more consecutives days. Recreational seafarers, passengers, and military personnel were excluded. Included papers underwent data extraction and medical causes of repatriation were classified into International Classification of Disease (ICD) 11th Revision codes. RESULTS: The search yielded 33 publications including 27 retrospective studies and 6 case studies. 9 of 27 studies focused on offshore workers and 18 included seafarers. The most common causes of medical repatriation reported in the literature were injuries, poisonings, and other consequences of external causes (ICD-22, ICD-23) at 25.2%. Diseases of the digestive system, including dental, (ICD-13) comprised 15.9%, and the musculoskeletal system (ICD-15) was 13.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Gaps in the available literature included a lack of demographic and occupational information required to properly assess risk factors for occupational illnesses and injuries among seafarers. The data indicate that injuries, diseases of the gastrointestinal system, and musculoskeletal system are the most common literature-reported causes of repatriation in occupational seafarers. This work may support enhancements to onboard medical capability and medical standards for workers in the marine and offshore industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0130.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Maritime HealthSame topicMaritime Navigation and SafetyFrench-language works237,207