MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410570902 · doi:10.1002/smtd.202402103

High‐Resolution 3D Printing of Stretchable Granular Hydrogel Filaments for Fabricating Robust and Durable Tissue Phantoms with Tunable Mechanical Strength

2025· article· en· W4410570902 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSmall Methods · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSelf-healing hydrogelsMaterials scienceUltimate tensile strengthToughnessComposite materialFabrication3D printingMechanical strengthBiomedical engineeringNanotechnologyPolymer chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Granular hydrogels are a promising class of 3D‐printable inks but often suffer from low printing resolution due to large microgel sizes (>100 µm) and weak mechanical performance from lower packing density. To overcome these limitations, a novel whey protein microgels‐based granular hydrogel (WMGH) is developed, consisting of uniform, size‐controllable microgels (1, 6, and 20 µm) via protein‐polysaccharide segregative phase separation. The smaller microgels enable WMGH to stretch like continuous liquid inks by adjusting printing speed and pressure, achieving high‐resolution 3D‐printing (200 µm) with minimal ink spreading (≈5%) using a 25G nozzle (260 µm). This allows the fabrication of intricate structures like human ear and aortic valve models. Incorporating a polyacrylamide (PAM) second percolating network transforms WMGH inks into double‐network hydrogels (DN‐WMGH), showing up to 36 fold increase in toughness (1.45 MJ m − 3 ) compared to PAM hydrogels. Controlling microgel size provides a new approach for tailoring mechanical strength (6–300 kPa) while maintaining durability, exhibiting full recovery after 100 tensile cycles at 100% strain. DN‐WMGH from biopolymers demonstrated good compatibility. This high‐resolution 3D‐printing of robust DN‐WMGH replicates the mechanical properties of various tissues, from brain (<10 kPa) to intestine (≈300 kPa), demonstrating new possibilities for tissue‐mimicking applications in surgical training, implantable devices, and drug‐delivery systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.433
Threshold uncertainty score0.765

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it