Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Control charts are practical tools for fault detection and recovery. However, traditional control charts rely on random samples collected from a production process at fixed time intervals, causing late detection if sampling intervals are too long or excessive sampling if the intervals are too short. In “Event-Triggered Bayesian Control Chart,” Abbou and Makis develop a novel control chart leveraging real-time data from smart sensors to jointly decide when to collect samples and when to stop the production process, leading to quick fault detection and recovery using few samples. Applying optimal stopping theory and dynamic programming analysis, the authors establish the average-cost optimality of their control chart and propose an efficient procedure for computing the optimal sampling and stopping thresholds. Through an empirical study, the control chart is shown to achieve substantial cost savings compared to benchmarks. Furthermore, thanks to its event-triggering mechanism, the proposed control chart requires little data communication from sensors, which is crucial from an energy-efficiency perspective.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it