MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410593979 · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113343

Signature kernel ridge regression time series model: A novel approach for hydrological drought modeling using multi-station meteorological drought information

2025· article· en· W4410593979 on OpenAlexaff
Mir Jafar Sadegh Safari, Shervin Rahimzadeh Arashloo, Babak Vaheddoost

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Soft Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRidgeSeries (stratigraphy)RegressionTime seriesKernel (algebra)ClimatologyRegression analysisSignature (topology)Computer scienceMeteorologyGeologyGeographyMachine learningCartographyStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the context of growing environmental challenges and the need for sustainable water resource management, hydrological drought prediction has gained prominence as a critical issue. Existing artificial intelligence and time series-based models for hydrological drought indices have traditionally been established using streamflow data. This study gives a significant progress in hydrological drought modeling through the introduction of the Signature Kernel Ridge Regression (SKRR) time series model. Instead of directly using rainfall and runoff data to develop a rainfall-runoff (RR) model, the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) values in neighbor meteorological stations serve as inputs for estimating the Streamflow Drought Index (SDI) in target hydrometric stations, considering the 3-, 6-, and 12-month moving average time windows. The objective of this study is to enhance hydrological drought modeling by integrating soft computing techniques that effectively handle multivariate and irregular time series. The efficacy of the SKRR is compared with the well-established Generalized Regression Neural Network (GRNN), Random Forest (RF), and Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average model with eXogenous input (ARIMAX). The findings indicate that SKRR is capable of precisely estimating SDI in three hydrometric stations using meteorological drought information from 14 stations, outperforming the GRNN, RF and ARIMAX models. The enhanced performance of the SKRR time series model stems from the utilization of a new and effective signature kernel which can be utilized for the study of irregularly sampled, multivariate time series in addition to be applicable to time series of different temporal spans while being a positive-definite kernel, facilitating usage in the Hilbert space. The novel drought based-RR model established by SKRR utilized various external stations’ meteorological drought indices to compute the hydrological drought indices in target stations not only enhances the modeling capability but also progress our understanding of drought dynamics by showcasing the power of soft computing in handling environmental uncertainty. Furthermore, it offers visions for developing of adaptive and resilience strategies to lessen the hazards caused by drought phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied Soft ComputingSame topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207