A name for the Provincial Fossil of British Columbia: a strange new elasmosaur taxon from the Santonian of Vancouver Island
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The first elasmosaurid skeleton from the Haslam Formation (Upper Santonian) of the Nanaimo Group (Late Cretaceous) on Vancouver Island was first described in 2002, and has recently been declared the Provincial Fossil of British Columbia. Since then, additional fossils have been recovered: an isolated right humerus and a well-preserved, osteologically immature skeleton comprising thorax, girdles and limbs. The Haslam material can now support further taxonomic assessment, and we erect the species Traskasaura sandrae based on it. Traskasaura possesses a strange mosaic of features. The mandible is plesiomorphic as seen in Libonectes: relatively narrow with large teeth and a broad symphysis. The skull therefore lacks any of the radical oral cavity adaptations seen in basal aristonectines. The neck of the Haslam animal is also plesiomorphic, with at least 36 preserved cervical vertebrae having vertebral length indices (VLIs) over 100 (the total number of cervicals is not known). The centra lack the anteroposterior compression and midline longitudinal constriction characteristic of derived aristonectines, yet the cervical ribs trend forward – a condition known only in derived aristonectines and Vegasaurus. The autapomorphic coracoid of Traskasaura differs greatly from any known elasmosaurid; the cardiform recess is reduced and posteriorly located, with some similarities to that of Aristonectes quiriquinensis. The humerus is autapomorphic, possessing a relatively straight shaft, pronounced ventral camber and an articular facet on the leading edge that makes a 90° angle with the radial facet. Taken together, these features document a new genus, with a plesiomorphic axial skeleton, but with several convergent appendicular adaptations with derived aristonectines. A revised phylogenetic analysis of Elasmosauridae recovered the new taxon in a basal position. Therefore, the postcranial adaptations shared with derived aristonectines appear to be convergent.https://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CCD94C38-E0E7-43CE-B757-A387D055C229
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".