The Impact of Cryptocurrencies on Stock Exchange Development: Empirical Evidence on Canadian firms
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cryptocurrencies are decentralized digital currencies secured by blockchain technology. Their growing popularity has a significant impact on traditional financial markets. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of cryptocurrency investment on stock financial development. Our empirical evidence is conducted on (30) Canadian firms during the period August 2017- May 2023. The firms are the most important companies in the financial sector. The results of the VECM estimation show a positive and significative impact of Bitcoin Value on each variable assessing stock market development in long term as Market Liquidity, Market Size, Market Capitalization. In short term, this same relationship is observed with Market Size and Market Liquidity. Bitcoin value has a negative impact on Market Capitalization. The Exchange Rate and Unemployment Rate provide a negative and significant relationship towards stock market development in the long-term. In contrast, the short-term relationship results show that Exchange Rate acts positively only on the Market Capitalization. In contrast, Market Liquidity has a positive impact on the Exchange Rate. Moreover, we find the absence of the impact of Unemployment Rate on Stock Financial Development in short term. But, there is a significant and negative incidence of Market Liquidity and Market Size on Unemployment Rate. Our results demonstrate also the positive and significant impact of Unemployment Rate on Bitcoin Value.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it