MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410629681 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105425

A hybrid machine learning and optimization framework for energy forecasting and management

2025· article· en· W4410629681 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sravani Parvathareddy, Abid Yahya, Lilian Amuhaya, Ravi Samikannu, Raymond S. Suglo

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research CentreBotswana International University of Science and Technology
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Energy managementArtificial intelligenceMachine learningIndustrial engineeringManagement scienceEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate energy prediction and load optimization are crucial for improving grid efficiency and lowering operational costs in industrial and commercial energy systems. This study presents a hybrid framework that combines Fourier Transform (FT)-based transformers for high-resolution energy forecasting with an improved Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES)-based genetic algorithm for optimal load scheduling. The novelty of this paper lies in the integration of FT-transformers with optimization algorithms to enhance forecasting accuracy and scheduling efficiency, offering a scalable solution for industrial-scale energy management. The FT-transformer model utilizes self-attention mechanisms and Fourier-based seasonality encoding to capture long-term dependencies, achieving a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 3.03 × 10 5 kWh and a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 3.31 × 10 5 kWh, representing an improvement of 48% over traditional Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs). The optimization component uses a multi-objective genetic algorithm CMA-ES to minimize peak energy demand fluctuations, reducing them by 27% while also minimizing cost deviations. Comparative analysis across various forecasting models, including RNNs, tree-based models, and CMA-ES, shows that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing techniques in both precision and computational efficiency. Scalability assessments indicate that, with their parallel processing capabilities, FT-transformers decrease the inference time by 38% compared to sequential models, making them suitable for real-time deployment in energy management systems. This study contributes to the field by integrating advanced machine learning with optimization for demand-side management, providing a scalable and efficient solution for industrial-scale energy forecasting. Future research will extend this framework with probabilistic forecasting and reinforcement learning for adaptive load control in dynamic energy environments. • Created a load forecasting model utilizing FT-transformers and genetic algorithms. • Achieved a 27% reduction in peak demand uncertainty during MATLAB simulations. • Enhanced predictive accuracy by 48% compared to Recurrent Neural Network utilizing self-attention. • Reduce the inference time by 38% to facilitate immediate energy management. • Validated the model utilizing MATLAB/Simulink and empirical mining data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResults in EngineeringSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207