MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410695830 · doi:10.1101/2025.05.20.655151

Sampling Aware Ancestral State Inference

2025· preprint· en· W4410695830 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicComputational and Text Analysis Methods
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSimon Fraser UniversityMichael Smith Health Research BCStrongPublic Health AgencyPublic Health Agency of Canada
KeywordsInferenceSampling (signal processing)State (computer science)Computer scienceStatisticsEconometricsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In phylogeography, ancestral state inference methods are used to identify the geographic or host species origin of viral or bacterial lineages and reconstruct their transmission histories over time. However, differences in sampling among states can bias these inference methods. We introduce sampling-aware ancestral state inference (SAASI), a method that accounts for sampling differences. Here, we apply SAASI to the multi-host spread of the H5N1 virus in the United States in 2024 and find that the key transmission event from wild birds to cattle is estimated to occur later under lower sampling in wild birds (compared to other species) than when sampling is not accounted for. Using simulation, we find that SAASI infers past viral locations/host species considerably more accurately than standard methods when sampling bias exists, is computationally feasible for large datasets and scales to trees with 100,000 tips.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it