MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410738199 · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3573690

Neural 3D Face Shape Stylization Based on Single Style Template via Weakly Supervised Learning

2025· article· en· W4410738199 on OpenAlexafffund
Peizhi Yan, Rabab Ward, Qiang Tang, Shan Du

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace recognition and analysis
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)Okanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFace (sociological concept)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer visionStyle (visual arts)VisualizationArtificial neural network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3D Face shape stylization refers to transforming a realistic 3D face shape into a different style, such as a cartoon face style. To solve this problem, this paper proposes modeling this task as a deformation transfer problem. This approach significantly reduces labor costs, as the artists would only need to create a single template for each face style. Realistic facial features of the original 3D face e.g. the nose or chin shape, would thus be automatically transferred to those in the style template. Deformation transfer methods, however, have two drawbacks. They are slow and they require re-optimization for every new input face. To address these weaknesses, we propose a neural network-based 3D face shape stylization method. This method is trained through weakly supervised learning, and its template's structure is preserved using our novel template-guided mesh smoothing regularization. Our method is the first learning-based deformation transfer method for 3D face shape stylization. Its employment offers the useful and practical benefit of not requiring paired training data. The experiments show that the quality of the stylized faces obtained by our method is comparable to that of the traditional deformation transfer method, achieving an average Chamfer Distance of approximately 0.01 mm. However, our approach significantly boosts the processing speed, achieving a rate approximately 3,000 times faster than the traditional deformation transfer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer GraphicsSame topicFace recognition and analysisFrench-language works237,207