The Critical Role of Artificial Intelligence in Optimizing Electrochemical Processes for Water and Wastewater Remediation: A State-of-the-Art Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming electrochemical water and wastewater treatment by enhancing efficiency, predictive accuracy, and process control. However, a comprehensive evaluation of AI models in optimizing electrochemical processes for pollutant removal is still lacking. This review addresses this gap by systematically analyzing AI applications in electrocoagulation (EC), electrooxidation (EO), electro-Fenton (EF), and electrodialysis (ED). Focusing on key advances and parameter optimization, it highlights how AI-driven models improve removal efficiency by capturing complex nonlinear interactions among variables such as current density, pH, electrode material, electrolyte composition, and pollutant concentration. Recent studies have notably shown that artificial neural networks (ANNs) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems (ANFIS) have achieved R 2 values above 0.99 in EC and EO processes, outperforming traditional models. Hybrid AI approaches like ANN-GA and ANFIS-ACO have further optimized catalyst dosage and ion migration in EF and ED. While AI has demonstrated remarkable potential, challenges such as limited data availability, model interpretability, and real-world implementation remain significant obstacles. Integrating AI with mechanistic modeling and real-time monitoring may overcome these barriers and enable autonomous, energy-efficient treatment systems. This Perspective offers critical insights into current progress and future opportunities, underscoring the role of intelligent optimization in advancing sustainable and scalable electrochemical water treatment technologies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it