MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4410807935 · doi:10.1080/00295450.2025.2475543

Development of a Neutronics–Thermal-Hydraulic Coupling Methodology to Support the Safety Analysis of Ghana Research Reactor-1

2025· article· en· W4410807935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNuclear Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear reactor physics and engineering
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeutron transportThermal hydraulicsNuclear engineeringResearch reactorCoupling (piping)Inherent safetyEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceEngineeringNuclear physicsPhysicsNeutronHeat transferThermodynamicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Computational codes traditionally used to simulate transient conditions in research reactors are often overly conservative, potentially overestimating safety margins. This study addressed these limitations by developing a best-estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) methodology to improve predictive accuracy in coupled neutronics–thermal-hydraulic safety analyses for research reactors. Using a high-fidelity BEPU simulation framework, the study analyzed a reactivity insertion accident (RIA) for the Ghana Research Reactor-1 (GHARR-1), focusing on the hottest and average coolant channels. This methodology incorporates an axial power profile from MCNP simulations to provide realistic input data for updating the PARET/ANL model under a small reactivity insertion of 3.8 milli-k.The results indicated that reactor power should not exceed 52 kW to preserve fuel cladding integrity. Peak fuel and clad temperatures remained safely below incipient melting thresholds, ensuring robust safety margins. The analysis also showed that the primary coolant temperature reached a maximum of 60°C, well below the boiling point, confirming operational safety.A stochastic uncertainty quantification approach was employed to propagate uncertainties in the input parameters. This analysis yielded a nominal power of 35 kW with a 95% confidence interval of ±0.64 kW, providing a more nuanced understanding of operational variability than the deterministic single-point estimate of 34 kW. By incorporating Monte Carlo sampling, this study enhances predictive accuracy and ensures that safety margins are statistically validated rather than conservatively assumed. This range enhanced confidence in the reactor’s performance under normal operating conditions.Under simulated RIA conditions involving an instantaneous 3.8-milli-k reactivity insertion, the BEPU analysis revealed a sharp power peak of 53 kW, highlighting the reactor’s potential behavior during reactivity excursions. A sensitivity analysis identified reactivity and initial reactor power as the most influential input parameters affecting key outputs, such as power and coolant temperature.This work demonstrated the utility of the BEPU approach in refining safety analyses, moving beyond conservative assumptions to deliver a more accurate and probabilistic understanding of reactor behavior under transient conditions. The study provides critical insights for defining safety thresholds and improving operational protocols in research reactor safety analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it