Fabrication of Patterned Magnetic Nanofilms and their Electrical and Thermal Transport Properties
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As microelectronic devices continue to scale down to the nanoscale, the electrical and thermal transport properties of nanofilms have garnered increasing attention. In this study, suspended nickel nanofilms with patterned arrays of square, circular, and triangular protrusions were successfully fabricated using MEMS technology in combination with electron-beam lithography. Investigations into their electrical and thermal transport characteristics revealed the following unique properties: (i) within the temperature range of 9–300[Formula: see text]K, the film resistivity initially increased gradually, followed by a linear rise as the temperature increased; (ii) magnetoresistance measurements showed significantly stronger effects under parallel magnetic fields compared to perpendicular ones, with the latter displaying double-peak characteristics during magnetic field sweeps and temperature-dependent peak positions; (iii) the maximum thermal conductivity of the films reached only about one-third that of bulk nickel, showing an initial rapid increase followed by saturation as the temperature rose. This work highlights the regulatory influence of patterned structures on the electrical and thermal transport behaviors of magnetic nanofilms, providing valuable insights for the design of microelectronic devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it