Assessment of pan coefficient performance: A comparative study of empirical and model-driven approaches using a hill-climbing-based alternating model tree and MOORA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Maritime Provinces of Canada play a significant role in the country's agricultural productivity, yet they face numerous changes due to climate change. Therefore, a reliable estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET o ) requires accurate determination of the pan coefficient (K pan ). However, this is quite challenging due to variations in climate change and the deep non-linearity of meteorological data. Intensive experiments for pan evaporation (E pan ) were conducted to develop a model, which includes hill-climbing based BestFirst-ClassifierSubsetEval (BF), alternating model tree (AMT), and multi-objective optimization by ratio analysis (MOORA). The model was assessed by comparing its performance using Bidirectional long-short-term memory (Bi-LSTM), recurrent neural network (RNN), random forest (RF), elastic regression net (Elastic net), and Instance-based learner K-Nearest Neighbor (IBK). The model was further evaluated using five empirical equations of FAO-56. The input data included seven daily meteorological variables, including maximum, minimum, mean, relative humidity, Wind, and Slope, extracted from 2018 to 2023 datasets to compute ET o and K pan locally measured E pan . Statistical indicators, including correlation coefficient (R), root mean square error (RMSE), Kling–Gupta efficiency (KGE), and Vulnerability, evaluated the model output. SHAP (Shapley Additive exPlanations) and Individual Conditional Expectation (ICE) were used to interpret the models' flexibility and visualize complex geographical phenomena and processes in an RF model. Overall, the outcomes revealed that the primary model (BF-AMT) outperformed all the data-driven and empirical models in terms of optimal metrics (RMSE=0.0143, Vulnerability=6.3260, and MOORA=0), followed by BF-Elastic net (RMSE=0.7891, Vulnerability=28.1081, and MOORA=0.073) and BF-Bi-LSTM (RMSE=0.0169, Vulnerability=64.8649, and MOORA=0.128), respectively. Finally, the SHAP results showed that wind and relative humidity were the most influential factors affecting the pan coefficient values. • An experimental study on Maritime Canada area for accurately estimating evapotranspiration. • Advanced ATM ensemble model with BestFirst, and MOORA to estimate more precise pan coefficients. • Comparing main scheme with BF-bi-LSTM, BF-RNN, BF-RF, BF-IBK, and BF-Elastic net. • Provided a pathway to improve water use efficiency and enhance irrigation practices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".