Adventively established Leptopilina japonica: a new opportunity for augmentative biocontrol of Drosophila suzukii
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The invasive spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii , has emerged as a significant global pest over the past decade, threatening fruit production worldwide. The parasitoid Leptopilina japonica , presumed native to East Asia, has established adventive populations in Europe and North America and is increasingly recognized for its ability to parasitize substantial proportions of D. suzukii larvae across diverse habitats. Here, we provide a broad review of the biology, establishment, distribution, and potential impacts of L. japonica . Using field data from international monitoring programs, we document the seasonal dynamics of plant–host–parasitoid associations and assess evidence for L. japonica ’s impact on D. suzukii and non-target organisms. Findings indicate that L. japonica has successfully established in several areas where D. suzukii is present in Europe and North America, showing promise as a biological control agent to support sustainable pest management. Current data suggest it provides some suppression of D. suzukii populations with minimal non-target effects. However, long-term studies are necessary to clarify its food web interactions and efficacy as a biological control agent. In areas where L. japonica has been established, we propose its use in augmentative biological control programs to enhance its impacts in specific agricultural settings. Case-specific evaluations of its ecological effects and role in integrated pest management, supported by continued monitoring, are essential. The case of L. japonica illustrates the need for clear, research-informed policies to guide the use of adventively established non-indigenous natural enemies in pest management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it