The creation of digital financial infrastructures in Africa and the philanthrocapitalism of the MCF
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Financial infrastructures are socio-technical processes created and sustained by power relations in the global political economy. We examine how the Mastercard Foundation, an understudied development actor, articulates such power relations through its participation in creation of digital financial infrastructures in Africa. Drawing from a social network analysis informed by theories of neocolonialism, we propose a critical engagement with the Foundation's agenda of ‘financial inclusion’. We argue that the Foundation's actions reveal the presence of potential materially extractive relations of power articulated around three markers of neocolonialism: the technocolonial structure of its fundings relationships; the structure of the partnerships enabling data extractivism; and the direction of the relationships thus set in motion. We demonstrate how the digitalization of the payment and credit systems the Foundation supports contributes to the creation of infrastructures of adverse financial inclusion and lays the groundwork for a dynamic of data extractivism that perpetuate forms of neocolonialism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it