MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411120930 · doi:10.1111/coin.70073

An Innovative Sentiment Influenced Stock Market Prediction Based on Dual Scale Adaptive Residual Long Short Term Memory With Attention Mechanism

2025· article· en· W4411120930 on OpenAlexaff
R. Gnanavel, J. M. Gnanasekar

Bibliographic record

VenueComputational Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicStock Market Forecasting Methods
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidualDual (grammatical number)Term (time)Computer scienceStock marketMechanism (biology)Artificial intelligenceStock (firearms)EconometricsCognitive psychologyEconomicsAlgorithmPsychologyEngineeringHistoryLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The stock market is extremely unpredictable and impulsive because of a variety of reasons, including public opinion, economic conditions, and so on. Each second, many Petabytes of data emerge from various sources, impacting the stock marketplace. A fair and effective merging of those sources of information (factors) into knowledge is predicted to improve the precision of stock market predictions. However, combining these characteristics from multiple sources of data into a single dataset to supply market evaluation is considered difficult since they are presented in various formats. This paper recommends a deep learning framework for performing prediction in the stock market by considering the sentiment text and historical information from social media. Initially, the required sentiment text and data are collected from the social media platform. From the database, the historical data of the company and the sentiment text from the user uploaded in the social media and news articles are collected. After that, the collected sentiment texts are preprocessed to remove the unwanted data. The preprocessed sentiment texts are given to the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model for retrieving the first set of features from the positive and negative sentiments. On the other hand, the deep features are retrieved from the data using a One‐Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1DCNN), which is considered a second feature set from historical data. The two sets of features retrieved from the sentiment text and data are passed to the Dual Scale Adaptive Residual Long Short‐Term Memory with Attention Mechanism (DSAResLSTM‐AM) for stock market price prediction, where the attributes of the ResLSTM are tuned using Enhanced Deep Sleep Optimizer (EDSO). Here, the sentiment text having positive and negative sentiments helps to predict the stock market price of the company effectively to be less or high along with the analysis of previous data. The recommended model helps to perform the accurate stock market prediction, and it is used to enhance the return and reduce the investment. Finally, experimental validations are conducted to find the performance of the developed model in the stock market prediction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.395
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputational IntelligenceSame topicStock Market Forecasting MethodsFrench-language works237,207