MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411175622 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.105697

Bone-inspired lattice structures for biomedical applications: Design, pore network analysis, and mechanical performance

2025· article· en· W4411175622 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of AlbertaKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
KeywordsLattice (music)Computer scienceMaterials sciencePhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to design metamaterials that replicate trabecular bone anisotropic structure and mechanical performance for bone replacement applications. While triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) gyroid structures like sheet (SHN) and solid (SON) networks have been explored for bone replacement, their uniform designs fail to fully capture bone’s anisotropy. To address this, we propose a hybrid (HYB) strategy as a more effective solution. We investigate bone-inspired structures by comparing human proximal femur models from micro-computed tomography (CT) images. A 3D lattice was extracted from the trabecular bone region, and compared with TPMS gyroid structures: SHN, SON, and HYB. All structures were standardized to a ∼33.75% relative density, ensuring a fair comparison, and their anisotropic behavior was analyzed using micromechanical homogenization. Finite element (FE) simulations under various loading conditions confirmed their elastic response and anisotropy. Additionally, the anisotropic behavior of bone material was also analyzed using bone analysis, while pore network modeling (PNM) characterized key pore parameters. Experimental validation included 3D printing via fused deposition modeling with carbon fiber-reinforced polylactic acid, followed by compression testing and elastoplastic FE simulations. Our results show that, compared with uniform TPMS structures, the HYB design closely replicates bone, making it a strong candidate for bone replacement applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it