MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411176321 · doi:10.1186/s42466-025-00393-0

Admission glucose is a significant outcome predictor in anterior circulation stroke: approaching the sweet spot

2025· article· en· W4411176321 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurological Research and Practice · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSweet spotCirculation (fluid dynamics)MedicineStroke (engine)CardiologyOphthalmologyInternal medicineSpeed skatingComputer scienceEngineeringSimulationPhysicsMechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Admission glycemia has emerged as an important outcome predictor in the context of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusions (LVO) in ischemic stroke. However, a clinically relevant threshold of glucose levels to identify patients at risk for poor functional outcome has yet to be established. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, monocentric, consecutive registry-based analysis of patients who underwent MT for anterior circulation LVO. Good outcome was defined as functional independence after 90 days (90d mRS < 3) or no deterioration from premorbid mRS. We performed a multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the association between admission glucose levels and functional outcome, including for well-established outcome predictors, i.e. age, NIHSS, Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), time to reperfusion, unsuccessful recanalization, presence of bleeding, and diabetes. In addition, we conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to determine the optimal admission glucose threshold that best discriminates patients at risk for poor outcome, maximizing sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: We analyzed 509 patients (mean age = 74.3 ± 12.6 years, median previous mRS = 1.5, 48% male). 194 patients (38.1%) had good outcome and 315 (61.9%) had poor outcome. According to the logistic regression admission glucose (p = 0.012, OR 1.009 95% CI [1.002 1.016]) contributed to predicting poor outcome, while known diabetes did not show a significant contribution. The ROC analysis revealed an admission glucose of 117 mg/dL (59.7% sensitivity; 58% specificity) to be the optimal cut-off value to discriminate patients at risk for poor outcome with an OR of 2.3. CONCLUSION: Admission hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of poor outcome after MT for LVO in the anterior circulation. We hypothesize, that optimal glucose values in patients undergoing MT will likely be in the low normoglycemic range. Prospective controlled studies with targeted glucose values will be needed for validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.017
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.017
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.116
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it