MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Aerial path planning for 3D urban scene reconstruction with dual-task reconstructability learning and adaptive viewpoints selection

2025· article· en· W4411200240 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViewpointsTask (project management)Computer scienceSelection (genetic algorithm)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionDual (grammatical number)Path (computing)Human–computer interactionVisual artsEngineeringArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using images captured by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) to perform 3D reconstruction is a cost-effective way to acquire high-quality 3D models for large-scale urban scenes. The challenge, however, has become choosing camera viewpoints and planning flight path accordingly. Existing methods either plan the aerial path heuristically or train a reconstructability predictor, where the accuracy and completeness losses are optimized separately in a two-phase approach, leading to inaccurate reconstruction results and poor generalizability. To address these issues, this paper proposes a dual-task learning framework that establishes the correlation between viewpoint poses and reconstruction quality. In particular, the reconstructability estimation problem is modeled as two subtasks: reconstruction accuracy and reconstruction completeness, allowing both subtasks to be tackled simultaneously within a unified network. The model’s generalizability is improved by the soft parameter sharing and a new dual-loss function with trainable weight parameters. In addition, an adaptive viewpoint optimization strategy is proposed to refine an initial set of viewpoints generated based on the learned reconstructability. Our framework is extensively evaluated on both public datasets and two datasets we collected. Qualitative and quantitative experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our method in both synthetic and real scenes. Our framework achieves consistent improvements over state-of-the-art approaches by an average of 3.6% in F-score with 15% fewer images, and surpasses Oblique Photography with a 6% F-score gain while using 40% less image data. These advancements hold universally across all test scenes, outperforming prior methods in terms of accuracy and completeness. • A dual-task framework to predict reconstruction accuracy and completeness error. • A dual-loss with trainable weight parameters to balance the training of subtasks. • An adaptive viewpoint optimization strategy to achieve better reconstruction results. • State-of-the-art performance in synthetic and real scenes across different datasets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.958
Threshold uncertainty score0.613

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it