Refugees, asylum seekers and other migrants in Central Mexico: The possibilities and limits of Triple Nexus efforts among state and non-state actors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Humanitarian-Development-Peace Triple Nexus seeks to increase cooperation and coordination to address short- and long-term needs of populations and create effective sustainable solutions. Through a gender and intersectional lens, we examine how humanitarian, development and peace practices and policies by state and non-state actors address the needs of refugees, asylum seekers and other migrants in Central Mexico. Drawing on ethnographic research and secondary sources, we find that international organizations used the HDP framework explicitly and implicitly to assist, train, and coordinate local government officials and civil society organizations. Although this process registered modest success, the long-term sustainability of these advances is threatened by the local exit of international organizations due to geopolitical conflicts and the turnover of elected officials. Furthermore, the development and peace dimensions of the HDP framework demand involvement of and coordination with national and transnational actors across different scales for them to be successfully addressed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it