MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411232033 · doi:10.1109/miot.2025.3578949

Revolutionizing Patient Care with Medical IoT and Generative AI

2025· article· en· W4411232033 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBig Data and Business Intelligence
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsGenerative grammarComputer scienceData scienceArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) are rapidly transforming the healthcare landscape. Their convergence, termed GAIoMT, offers a powerful paradigm that combines GAI’s ability to generate synthetic data, support predictive analytics, and enable autonomous decision-making with IoMT’s real-time sensing and connectivity capabilities. This paper introduces and formalizes the concept of GAIoMT, presenting a layered architectural framework that illustrates how generative models can be integrated across medical devices, data infrastructures, and clinical workflows. A thematically structured review of the current literature is provided along with performance and complexity analysis across representative GAIoMT methods. A practical use case scenario is included to demonstrate real-world applicability, particularly in chronic disease management. Finally, we identify key challenges and outline future research directions for building robust, explainable, and inclusive GAIoMT systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.492
Threshold uncertainty score0.513

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it