Automated quantitative analysis of peri-articular bone microarchitecture in HR-pQCT knee images
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Applying HR-pQCT to image the knee necessitates the development and validation of novel image analysis workflows. Here, we present and validate the first automated workflow for in vivo quantitative assessment of peri-articular bone density and microarchitecture in the knee. Segmentation models were first trained with radius and tibia images (N=2,598) then fine-tuned with knee images (N=131). Atlas-based registration was used to create medial and lateral contact surface masks, which were combined with bone segmentations to generate peri-articular regions of interest masks. The accuracy and precision of the workflow was assessed with an external validation dataset (N=128) and a triple-repeat measures dataset (N=29), respectively. Predicted and reference morphological parameters had linear coefficients of determination between 0.86 and 0.99, with moderate bias present in predictions of subchondral bone plate density and thickness. The average short-term precision RMS%CV estimates across all compartments and all morphological parameters ranged from 1.0 % to 2.9 %. BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There is growing interest in applying HR-pQCT to image the knee, particularly in the study of osteoarthritis. This necessitates the development and validation of novel image analysis workflows tailored to knee HR-pQCT images. In this work, we present and validate the first fully automated workflow for in vivo quantitative assessment of peri-articular bone density and microarchitecture in the human knee. METHODS: Bone segmentation models were trained by transfer learning with a large dataset of radius and tibia images (N=2,598) and fine-tuned on a knee image dataset (N=131). Tibia and femur atlases were created and atlas-based registration was used to identify medial and lateral contact surfaces. Morphological operations combined bone segmentations and atlas-generated contact surface masks to generate peri-articular regions of interest masks, in which standard morphological analysis was applied. The accuracy and precision of estimated morphological parameters was assessed with an external validation dataset containing femurs and tibiae (N=128) and a triple-repeat measures dataset containing only tibiae (N=29), respectively. RESULTS: ) and thickness (＋0.15 mm). With intra-participant rigid registration, the average short-term precision RMS%CV estimates across all compartments were 2.2 % and 2.8 % for subchondral bone plate density and thickness, respectively, and 1.1 %, 2.9 %, 1.0 %, and 2.9 % for trabecular density, separation, thickness, and number, respectively. CONCLUSION: We have developed and evaluated an automated workflow for peri-articular analysis of knee HR-pQCT images, integrating deep learning, atlas-based segmentation, and standard image processing approaches. The code, atlases, and models have been made freely available for other researchers to use, improve, or extend. Future work will focus on the application of the workflow to clinical data to investigate osteoarthritis etiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it