UAV Autonomous Navigation System Based on Air–Ground Collaboration in GPS-Denied Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper explores breakthroughs from the perspective of UAV navigation architectures and proposes a UAV autonomous navigation method based on aerial–ground cooperative perception to address the challenge of UAV navigation in GPS-denied and unknown environments. The approach consists of two key components. Firstly, a mobile anchor trilateration and environmental modeling method is developed using a multi-UAV system by integrating the visual sensing capabilities of aerial surveillance UAVs with ultra-wideband technology. It constructs a real-time global 3D environmental model and provides precise positioning information, supporting autonomous planning and target guidance for near-ground UAV navigation. Secondly, based on real-time environmental perception, an improved D* Lite algorithm is employed to plan rapid and collision-free flight trajectories for near-ground navigation. This allows the UAV to autonomously execute collision-free movement from the initial position to the target position in complex environments. The results of real-world flight experiments demonstrate that the system can efficiently construct a global 3D environmental model in real time. It also provides accurate flight trajectories for the near-ground navigation of UAVs while delivering real-time positional updates during flight. The system enables UAVs to autonomously navigate in GPS-denied and unknown environments, and this work verifies the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed air–ground cooperative perception navigation system, as well as the mobile anchor trilateration and environmental modeling method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".