Stable brain PET metabolic networks using a multiple sampling scheme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Interregional communication within the human brain is essential for maintaining functional integrity. A promising approach for investigating how brain regions communicate relies on the assumption that the brain operates as a complex network. In this context, positron emission tomography (PET) images have been suggested as a valuable source for understanding brain networks. However, such networks are typically assembled through direct computation without accounting for outliers, impacting the reliability of group representative networks. In this study, we used brain [18F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET data from 1,227 individuals in the Alzheimer’s disease (AD) continuum from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort to develop a novel method for constructing stable metabolic brain networks that are resilient to spurious data points. Our multiple sampling scheme generates brain networks with greater stability compared with conventional approaches. The proposed method is robust to imbalanced datasets and requires 50% fewer subjects to achieve stability than the conventional method. We further validated the approach in an independent AD cohort (n = 114) from São Paulo, Brazil (Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo). This innovative method is flexible and improves the robustness of metabolic brain network analyses, supporting better insights into brain connectivity and resilience to data variability across multiple radiotracers for both health and disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".