MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411371930 · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2025.105134

QPOPSS: Query and Parallelism Optimized Space-Saving for finding frequent stream elements

2025· article· en· W4411371930 on OpenAlexaff
Victor Jarlow, Charalampos Stylianopoulos, Marina Papatriantafilou

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsASTER
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsHORIZON EUROPE Framework ProgrammeVetenskapsrådetEnergimyndighetenEuropean Commission
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel computingParallelism (grammar)Space (punctuation)Query optimizationDatabaseOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The frequent elements problem, a key component in demanding stream-data analytics, involves selecting elements whose occurrence exceeds a user-specified threshold. Fast, memory-efficient ϵ -approximate synopsis algorithms select all frequent elements but may overestimate them depending on ϵ (user-defined parameter). Evolving applications demand performance only achievable by parallelization. However, algorithmic guarantees concerning concurrent updates and queries have been overlooked. We propose Query and Parallelism Optimized Space-Saving (QPOPSS ), providing concurrency guarantees. A cornerstone of the design is a new approach for the main data structure for the Space-Saving algorithm, enabling support of very fast queries. QPOPSS integrates this, minimal overlap with concurrent updates, with the distribution of work and fine-grained synchronization among threads, swiftly balancing high throughput, high accuracy, and low memory consumption. Our analysis shows space and approximation bounds under various concurrency and data distribution conditions. Our empirical evaluation relative to representative state-of-the-art methods reveals that QPOPSS 's multi-threaded throughput scales linearly while maintaining the highest accuracy, with orders of magnitude smaller memory footprint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Parallel and Distributed ComputingSame topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207