MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411408442 · doi:10.1109/mnano.2025.3570822

Approximate and Stochastic Ising Machines

2025· article· en· W4411408442 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Nanotechnology Magazine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates
KeywordsIsing modelStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ising model is useful in searching for (sub)-optimal solutions of combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). CMOS implementations of Ising model-based solvers, commonly referred to as Ising machines, provide reliable and accurate solutions with flexible and dense connectivities. However, they incur a significant hardware overhead. Approximate computing, as a low-power technique, offers a way to reduce hardware complexity, while stochastic computing is efficient in simulating the dynamics of the Ising model. The approximations introduced by these techniques may be beneficial in helping the system escape from local minima. In this article, we discuss the potential of using approximate and stochastic computing to improve the performance of Ising machines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.973

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it