MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411540601 · doi:10.58931/cibdt.2025.3140

Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Elderly

2025· article· en· W4411540601 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian IBD Today · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsPolypharmacyMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseIncidence (geometry)Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesPopulationGerontologyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) among the elderly in Canada has increased from 1 out of 160 seniors in 2018, to 1 out of 88 seniors in 2023, representing 1.14% of the senior population. It is thought that more than one-third of all IBD patients will be over 60 years of age in the next decade. The prevalence is expected to increase due to a combination of new diagnoses as well as the aging of younger people already living with IBD. Elderly persons with IBD face unique challenges that younger people with IBD often do not, such as co-existing comorbidities, frailty, polypharmacy, and an increased risk of infections and cancer. While the therapeutic management of elderly persons with IBD is similar to that of younger people with IBD, it requires careful consideration of many different factors, and special attention is needed when weighing the risks and benefits of medical therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.844

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it