MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411648719 · doi:10.1007/s44327-025-00099-7

Digitally melting cities under climate stress

2025· article· en· W4411648719 on OpenAlexaff
Ünsal Özdilek

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Cities · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Cities and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStress (linguistics)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Urban land-use planning has traditionally assumed that core functions—industry, housing, office, and retail—require expansive, permanent physical footprints. This physicality paradigm, inherited from the beginning of organized urbanism, is now challenged by rapid digitization and intensifying environmental and climate pressures. Increasingly, tasks once anchored to factories, offices, and storefronts migrate to automated, remote, or virtual platforms, undermining the notion that physical expansion must track economic or social progress. Confronted with global urbanization and looming climate emergencies, digitization compels a reevaluation of how cities allocate land, consume resources, and protect vulnerable communities. This paper introduces a dynamic “meltdown” framework for understanding how digitization systematically erodes structural reliance, thereby freeing or repurposing land for adaptive reuse. Drawing on spatio‐temporal big data from sensor networks, remote sensing, geographic information systems, and occupant analytics, we examine how key urban tasks—production, commerce, administration, and residency—can be quantified for “meltability” based on physical anchorage, digital capacity, and environmental constraints. Our model demonstrates that meltdown not only diminishes structural demand but also opens opportunities for greener infrastructure, such as flood buffers or urban forests, thus enhancing climate resilience. By integrating real‐time data and occupant‐centered metrics, planners and policymakers can anticipate where and when digital alternatives render conventional land uses obsolete, proactively converting those areas to more sustainable or socially beneficial functions. In doing so, this research transcends conventional “smart city” optimization, revealing how occupant activities disrupt once‐immutable footprints and forging a data‐driven path to reduce carbon emissions, strengthen ecosystem services, and help equitable, knowledge‐driven urban development under mounting climate challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover CitiesSame topicSmart Cities and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207