MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411686995 · doi:10.22584/nr57.2025.007

Yukon First Nations Settlement Land Development

2025· article· en· W4411686995 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul Kishchuk

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Northern Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsArctic Athabaskan Council
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSettlement (finance)GeographyArchaeologyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Northern Review 57: 51–72Abstract: As part of modern treaties in the Yukon, self-governing Yukon First Nations each hold title to significant amounts of “Settlement Land.” Modernization of the Yukon Government’s Land Titles Act in 2016 made it possible for subsidiary title, including leasehold interests on Settlement Land, to be entered on the Yukon Government’s land titles registry without extinguishing Indigenous rights and title. The Land Titles Act changes also means that development on Settlement Land is now “bankable,” as lending institutions have gained the authority to seize a leasehold land title in case a mortgage defaults. Modernization of the Yukon’s land titles statute was a first step in unlocking the potential of Settlement Lands for the benefit of Yukon First Nations citizens and beneficiaries, and encouraging economic development throughout the Yukon. In addition to describing how the Yukon’s land titles statute was modernized, this article identifies next steps in realizing the economic development potential, including a discussion of potential benefits and remaining challenges for projects related to leasehold developments on Settlement Land. The article concludes by highlighting examples of early leasehold development successes.Résumé: Dans le cadre des traités modernes au Yukon, chacune des Premières Nations autonomes détient des titres de « terres de règlement ». La modernisation de la Loi sur les titres de biens-fonds du gouvernement du Yukon en 2016 a permis que les titres subsidiaires, y compris les intérêts à bail sur les terres de règlement, soient inscrits au registre des titres fonciers du Yukon sans porter atteinte aux droits et titres autochtones. Ces changements ont aussi rendu le développement immobilier sur ces terres « bancable », puisque les institutions prêteuses peuvent désormais saisir le titre des terres à bail en cas de défaut de paiement hypothécaire. La modernisation des lois sur les titres fonciers au Yukon a constitué une première étape pour libérer le potentiel des terres de règlement, au bénéfice des citoyens des Premières Nations du Yukon et des bénéficiaires, et pour encourager le développement économique dans tout le territoire. En plus de décrire cette modernisation, cet article identifie les prochaines étapes pour concrétiser ce potentiel économique, en discutant des bénéfices possibles et des défis restants pour les projets de développement sur les terres à bail. L’article conclut en mettant en lumière des exemples de succès issus des premiers projets de développement sur ces terres. French translation, Sara Tahiri

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Northern ReviewSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207