Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This essay considers what a rewilding critical practice would look like with reference to Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre (1847). At the ecological turn in literary studies, what remains to be said about one of the most canonical novels in Victorian literature? To rewild Jane Eyre, a novel better known for its domestic interiors and production of individualist subjectivity, is to pay attention to the traces of its narrative shadow forests and strange otherweathers, to the latent potential of the novel’s more-than-human forms. Attending to Jane Eyre’s untamed sections, we discover how rewilding attunes us to a dynamic set of aesthetics and ontologies: the substrate and aerial, the ghosted and spectralised. Instead of mastering the unruly ‘wild patch’ of Jane’s wander through moorland wilderness we wonder over it, even as it presses us into the present moment of ecological crisis. A tarrying with the strange, ludic rewilding has the potential to reactivate the dormant systems of even our most familiar literary objects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it