MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411823484 · doi:10.32985/ijeces.16.6.5

DCT-based Robust Reversible Watermarking Technique based on histogram Modification

2025· article· en· W4411823484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational journal of electrical and computer engineering systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDigital watermarkingDiscrete cosine transformHistogramArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceHistogram matchingComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Image (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a strong, reversible image watermarking technique based on discrete cosine transform (DCT) and histogram shifting is proposed, where it overcomes the following concerns: (i) Reversing the cover object to its starting appearance is the primary goal of the reversible watermarking system. (ii) Military, medical, and standard law enforcement images are the main types of images that require distortion and reinstatement of the cover object following the watermark extraction. (iii) Lack of robustness and cover image-dependent embedding capacity are the primary concerns about reversible watermarking. Decompose the cover object into blocks that don't overlap in the first stage to insert a binary watermark bit into every block that is converted. These binary bits of watermark are embedded by altering a single set of middle substantial AC coefficients. To restore the cover image, subsequently using the histogram bin shifting method, a location map is created and integrated within the cover image. On the extracting side, at first, a location map is extracted from the image using the histogram bin shifting technique. In the following step, the image's watermark is recovered, and a reversed image has been generated using a location map. To verify the robustness property, several image processing attacks are tested with the suggested reversible watermarking approach, and favorable results are attained. The proposed scheme using the Lena image achieved 46.62 imperceptibility for 4096 embedding capacities. To methodically evaluate the proposed approach, it is compared with two current reversible watermarking systems, where they achieved 39.10 and 37.90 imperceptibility with 4.4 × 103 and 256 embedding capacities, respectively. The experimental results affirmed that the suggested method exhibits superior performance relative to these existing techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it