New two parameter hybrid estimator for zero inflated negative binomial regression models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The zero-inflated negative binomial regression (ZINBR) model is used for modeling count data that exhibit both overdispersion and zero-inflated counts. However, a persistent challenge in the efficient estimation of parameters within ZINBR models is the issue of multicollinearity, where high correlations between predictor variables can compromise the stability and reliability of the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE). We propose a new two-parameter hybrid estimator, designed for the ZINBR model, to address this problem. This estimator aims to mitigate the effects of multicollinearity by incorporating a combination of existing biased estimators. To test the effectiveness of the proposed estimator, we conduct a comprehensive theoretical comparison with conventional biased estimators, including the Ridge and Liu, the Kibria-Lukman, and the modified Ridge estimators. An extended Monte Carlo simulation study complements the theoretical results, evaluating the estimator's performance under various multicollinearity conditions. The simulation results, evaluated by metrics such as mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE), show that the proposed hybrid estimator consistently outperforms conventional methods, especially in high multicollinearity. Furthermore, we apply it to two real-world datasets. The experimental application demonstrates the superior performance of the estimator in producing stable and accurate parameter estimates. The simulation study and experimental application results strongly suggest that the new two-parameter hybrid estimator offers significant progress in parameter estimation in ZINBR models, especially in complex scenarios due to multicollinearity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.028 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".