MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411895356 · doi:10.1186/s40793-025-00734-1

Rapid and sustained differentiation of disease-suppressive phyllosphere microbiomes in tomato following experimental microbiome selection

2025· article· en· W4411895356 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Microbiome · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersHuck Institutes of the Life SciencesNational Institute of Food and AgricultureMinistry of Education- New ZealandFulbright New ZealandPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity of PennsylvaniaNortheast SAREU.S. Department of Agriculture
KeywordsPhyllosphereMicrobiomeBiologyPseudomonas syringaeMetagenomicsPseudomonasShotgun sequencingAbundance (ecology)Relative species abundanceDysbiosisMicrobiologyGeneticsPathogenBacteriaEcologyGeneDNA sequencing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Microbial-based treatments to protect plants against phytopathogens typically focus on soil-borne disease or the aboveground application of one or a few biocontrol microorganisms. However, diverse microbiomes may provide unique benefits to phytoprotection in the phyllosphere, by restricting pathogen access to niche space and/or through multiple forms of direct antagonism. We previously showed that successive experimental passaging of phyllosphere microbiomes along with the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto), which causes bacterial speck in tomato, led to the development of a disease suppressive microbial community. Here, we used amplicon sequencing to assess bacterial and fungal composition at the end of each passage, as well as shotgun metagenomics at key passages based on observed disease-suppressive phenotypes, to assess differences in functional potential between suppressive and non-suppressive communities. RESULTS: Bacterial composition changed and diversity declined quickly due to passaging and remained low, particularly in treatments with Pto present, whereas fungal diversity did not. Pseudomonas and Xanthomonas populations were particularily enriched in disease-suppressive microbiomes compared to conducive microbiomes. The relative abundance of Pseudomonas syringae group gemonosp. 3 (the clade to which the introduced pathogen belongs) in shotgun metagenomic data was similar to what we observed for Pseudomonas ASVs in the 16S rRNA gene dataset. We also observed an increase in the abundance of genes associated with microbial antagonism at Passage 4, corresponding to the highest observed disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Taxonomic richness and evenness were low within samples, with clustering occurring for suppressive or non-suppressive microbiomes. The relative abundance of genes associated with antagonism was higher for disease-suppressive phyllosphere microbiomes. This work is an important step towards understanding the microbe-microbe interactions within disease-suppressive phyllosphere communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.218
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it