MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411965067 · doi:10.1002/ese3.70209

Long‐Term Performance Analysis of Foundation Pile and Vertical Borehole Heat Exchangers for Ground Source Heat Pump Systems in Cold Climates

2025· article· en· W4411965067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy Science & Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGeothermal Energy Systems and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEnergi SimulationUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsBoreholeHeat pumpPileHeat exchangerFoundation (evidence)Term (time)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringEnvironmental sciencePetroleum engineeringEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Ground source heat pump systems (GSHPs) have received considerable interest from researchers for the decarbonization of energy use in buildings owing to their higher efficiency. The ground heat exchanger (GHE) is the primary component of a GSHP. Vertical borehole heat exchangers (VBHE) and foundation piles (FP) are common GHEs that researchers are developing and optimizing to reduce capital cost and seasonal ground thermal imbalance associated with GSHP. While VBHEs have been a subject of research for decades, FPs are emerging as an excellent replacement for VBHEs because the initial cost associated with installation is lower, and their installation does not require complex drilling equipment and expertise. In this study, a numerical investigation was undertaken to characterize the performance of a VBHE and an FP in a GSHP system under the same operating conditions. Realistic time‐varying building energy loads were used for a residential building in Calgary, Alberta. To verify the reliability of the developed model, the results from the model were compared with experimental data from the literature, yielding excellent agreement. The results of this study indicate the potential for ground freezing due to continuous heat extraction in the vicinity of the FP and VBHE if the peak building energy load capacity exceeds 1.1 kW (0.3 tons) per FP and 5.6 kW (1.5 tons) per 150 m VBHE, respectively. Overall, using 5.6 kW per 150 m VBHE performs better, with a lower ground temperature decline, the highest heating mode coefficient of performance (COP), and a less pronounced decline in outlet temperature after the fifth operation cycle. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing GHEs, enhancing system efficiency, and ensuring long‐term thermal sustainability.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.169
Threshold uncertainty score0.739

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it