Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Against the backdrop and analysis of two legal cases, this article explores how Muslim women who chose to wear a niqab or a hijab deepen sociological understandings of lived religion and lived citizenship. I argue that the legal regulation of religion, in our case Muslim women’s sartorial religious practices, is anchored within notions of the authoritative rights of the state that adjudicate the ways that religion ought to be embodied in the public sphere and how citizens are permitted to differ for what Joseph Pugliese (2010) has termed prosthetic citizen wherein certain bodies must conform to state-sanctioned norms to be fully recognised as citizens. Drawing from this, I introduce the notion of ‘prosthetic believer’ to explore the politicised constraints placed on religious practice. The article argues that Muslim women’s engagements with law and public space reveal the multiplicity and complexity of agency; and the relational understanding that women have of themselves, their bodies, their sense of self, and their subjectivities that are inseparable from their lived experience of religion and lived citizenship.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it