MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411979209 · doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000001696

Using Quality Function Deployment to Design an Image-Guided, Multibiopsy Tool for Neurosurgical Applications

2025· article· en· W4411979209 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperative Neurosurgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineImaging phantomSuctionMedical physicsSoftware deploymentForcepsSample (material)Biomedical engineeringRadiologySurgeryComputer scienceSoftware engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The ability to molecularly characterize spatially heterogeneous tumors, such as primary brain tumors, depends on the efficient and consistent collection of spatially defined tissue samples free of cross-contamination. Currently available neurosurgical tools, designed for clinical use rather than modern molecular characterization, limit our view of heterogeneous processes to snapshots of single regions. This study introduces a novel biopsy device that enables the precise, reproducible, and spatially registered collection of tissue across a tumor and surgical cavity, paving the way for advancements in personalized tumor characterization and treatment. METHODS: Prototypes were developed using a Quality Function Deployment framework to prioritize user requirements and technical needs. Iterative modeling and 3D printing produced prototypes that underwent proof-of-concept and phantom testing. Final validation involved comparative testing of the novel biopsy tool and Yasargil tumor-grasping forceps by 6 neurosurgeons and 6 students. Clinical feasibility was assessed through the collection of 10 intraoperative tissue samples using each device. RESULTS: The lead design, which met all Quality Function Deployment requirements, consists of an optically tracked capsule that attaches to a Frazier suction. When suction is applied, a piston is pulled up and the sample is securely contained. After releasing the suction, manual depression ejects the tissue. In comparative testing, the capsule method reduced variability in sample weight and collection time compared with the Yasargil forceps. It also demonstrated greater ease of use, enabling students to achieve results comparable with experienced surgeons. Clinical testing revealed no differences in sample variability, tissue preservation, or instrument failure. CONCLUSION: This optically tracked navigated biopsy tool offers a low-cost, efficient, easily used, and consistent method for brain biopsy collection. The novel device is well suited for precision medicine and translational research needs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.932

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.420
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it