MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411996945 · doi:10.1109/tmlcn.2025.3585849

Machine Learning Aided Resilient Spectrum Surveillance for Cognitive Tactical Wireless Networks: Design and Proof-of-Concept

2025· article· en· W4411996945 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Machine Learning in Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProof of conceptWirelessComputer scienceCognitionCognitive radioSpectrum (functional analysis)Human–computer interactionComputer securityPsychologyTelecommunicationsNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cognitive tactical wireless networks (TWNs) require spectrum awareness to avoid interference and jamming in the communication channel and assure quality-of-service in data transmission. Conventional supervised machine learning (ML) algorithm’s capability to provide spectrum awareness is confronted by the requirement of labeled interference signals. Due to the vast nature of interference signals in the frequency bands used by cognitive TWNs, it is non-trivial to acquire manually labeled data sets of all interference signals. Detecting the presence of an unknown and remote interference source in a frequency band from the transmitter end is also challenging, especially when the received interference power remains at or below the noise floor. To address these issues, this paper proposes an automated interference detection framework, entitled MARSS (Machine Learning Aided Resilient Spectrum Surveillance). MARSS is a fully unsupervised method, which first extracts the low-dimensional <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">representative features</i> from spectrograms by suppressing noise and background information and employing convolutional neural network (CNN) with novel loss function, and subsequently, distinguishes signals with and without interference by applying an isolation forest model on the extracted features. The uniqueness of MARSS is its ability to detect <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">hidden</i> and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">unknown</i> interference signals in multiple frequency bands <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">without using any prior labels</i>, thanks to its superior feature extraction capability. The capability of MARSS is further extended to infer the level of interference by designing a multi-level interference classification framework. Using extensive simulations in GNURadio, the superiority of MARSS in detecting interference over existing ML methods is demonstrated. The effectiveness MARSS is also validated by extensive over-the-air (OTA) experiments using software-defined radios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it