Carbon Doped Boron Nitride Nano‐Coatings for Durable, Low Emissivity Glass Windows
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Energy‐efficient, durable low‐emissivity (low‐E) glass windows are in demand for reducing energy consumption and comfortable living environments. However, commercial low‐E coating materials are expensive, prone to abrasion, and hence coated only on the interior side of windows, limiting their energy efficiency. Here, a new material is introduced, namely chemically inert and transparent carbon (C) doped boron nitride (BN) nano‐coatings on glass surfaces at room temperature using pulsed laser deposition, that shows promising long‐wave infrared emissivity (ε LWIR ≈0.42). The hydrophilic C‐BN coatings on glass show excellent environmental stability including high temperature‐high humidity degradation resistance, UV‐light, thermal cycling, freezing condition, and saltwater resilience. Furthermore, the coating shows promising adhesion on the glass surface with full scratch protection. In an actual‐sized building energy simulation for cold‐climates, the intended exterior‐side C‐BN coated low‐E glass shows 2.9% energy savings compared to the interior‐side coated commercial low‐E glass. C‐BN would be a useful coating material for durable and energy‐efficient low‐E glass window technology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it