Exploring Gender Differentials in Parents’ Perception of Children’s Television Viewing Habit in the Digital Era
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Television viewing is rapidly becoming a habit among individuals, especially children. The concerns about the effects of the habit on children informed this study. The study explores the gender differentials in parents’ perception of television viewing habit among children in the digital era. Using un/structured questionnaire, primary data were sourced from 300 parents in Pankshin, Plateau State, North-Central Nigeria. Survey design, mixed method, and content, thematic, descriptive and statistical analyses along with their allied analytical tools were employed. The results show that gender may influence parents’ perception of and attitude towards children’s television viewing habit, though the influence is insignificant. The pragmatic strategies identified for effective parental control of the habit are affirmed by majority of the respondents. The study concludes gender may influence parents’ perception of and attitude towards the habit, but it is not a determinant of their perception of and attitude towards the habit. Co-operation, collaboration, mutual understanding, and gender re/orientation are some of the recommendations made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.014 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it