Machine learning-assisted high-throughput prediction and experimental validation of high-responsivity extreme ultraviolet detectors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Identifying materials with optimal optoelectronic properties for targeted applications represents both a critical need and a persistent challenge in optoelectronic device engineering. Machine learning models often depend on extensive datasets, which are typically lacking in specialized research domains such as extreme ultraviolet (EUV) radiation detection. Here, we demonstrate a Cross-Spectral Response Prediction framework that leverages existing visible and ultraviolet (UV) photoresponse data to predict more efficient material’s performance under EUV radiation. Our predictive model, based on Extremely Randomized Trees, correlates physical descriptors with performance across different spectral regions using a comprehensive dataset of 1927 samples. Through this approach, we identified promising materials such as α-MoO3, MoS2, ReS2, PbI2, and SnO2, achieving responsivities varying from 20 to 60 A/W, exceeding conventional silicon photodiodes by ~225 times in EUV sensing applications. Monte Carlo simulations revealed double electron generation rates (~2×106 electrons per million EUV photons) compared to silicon, with experimental validation confirming the effectiveness of our prediction framework for accelerating the discovery of other high performing materials for diverse spectral applications. Here, the authors report a machine-learning-based high-throughput prediction framework to identify materials with strong extreme ultraviolet (EUV) photoresponse and experimentally demonstrate the promising performance of α-MoO3 EUV detectors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".