MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412121008 · doi:10.5194/epsc-dps2025-24

CENTAURS: Highlights from the new book and the Next Ten Years for Centaur Research

2025· preprint· en· W4412121008 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Womack, Kathryn Volk, Jordan K. Steckloff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Exploration and Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCentaurAstrobiologyAeronauticsEngineeringAstronomyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Centaurs are an unstable, transitional population of small, icy bodies connecting the Jupiter-family comets (JFCs) to their reservoir population in the trans-Neptunian region. Due to the more extreme thermal environment of the giant-planet region relative to that of the trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs), Centaurs experience rapid dynamical and physical changes, thermophysically evolving these otherwise well-preserved objects. Many of these physical changes may be seen in the surface topography, ices, and refractory composition and volatiles emitted from active Centaurs. The dawn of several new observational assets and laboratory techniques whose data will be augmented with dramatically increased computing power indicates that Centaur research is at the start of a transformational era. Here we briefly summarize some of the foundational discoveries covered in earlier chapters of the new book CENTAURS and review what is needed to make significant progress on outstanding problems. We also present and discuss eight Centaur Priority Goals for the next ten years that we put in context of the 2023 U.S. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine’s decadal survey for Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.148

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0130.011
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Exploration and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207