MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4412125298 · doi:10.4000/14b02

Management algorithmique et dépendance économique d’une main-d’œuvre racisée

2025· article· fr· W4412125298 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTravail et emploi · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicAssembly Line Balancing Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alors que les chauffeurs Uber sont des travailleurs indépendants présumés qui bénéficient théoriquement d’une forte autonomie au travail, ils se voient soumis à une nouvelle forme de contrôle exercé par la plateforme. Le management algorithmique combine ainsi des instruments de pouvoir relevant de la logique disciplinaire et de la logique gouvernementale pour orienter leurs comportements. S’appuyant sur une enquête réalisée auprès de chauffeurs à Paris, Londres et Montréal, cet article se propose d’appréhender la manière dont se manifeste concrètement ce management algorithmique, les ressorts de son efficacité, mais également les résistances que les chauffeurs sont susceptibles de lui opposer. Il démontre ainsi que son efficacité ne repose pas tant sur les caractéristiques techniques des dispositifs mis en œuvre que sur la dépendance économique à la plateforme d’une main-d’œuvre racisée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.448
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it